| 
            
      
 | 
            
              
            By: Lisa Kift, MA MFT-I 
            	 
 
 
            Couples seek relationship counseling for 
			numerous reasons. As a professional who works with many different 
			couples with a variety of issues, I've identified one similar thread 
			that runs through all of them. Their relationships lack in varying 
			degrees of "emotional safety." Typically, the couples who present as 
			the most hostile, distant, angry, disengaged or otherwise 
			dysfunctional are the least emotionally safe together. Even people 
			who come for counseling who have less glaring issues can benefit 
			from a tune-up in this area.  
			 
			So what is "emotional safety" in a relationship? I define this as 
			the level of comfort both people feel with each other. There are six 
			aspects in which to assess the emotional safety in a relationship. 
			They are respect, feeling heard, understanding, validation, empathy 
			and love. How can one assess their own relationship based on this 
			paradigm? When working with couples, I often ask each partner to 
			rate, from zero to ten, (zero being "never" and ten being "all the 
			time") how much they feel each of the six mentioned aspects of 
			emotional safety from their partner. I chart it out with each 
			person's name written on the top of a piece of paper with a column 
			under each. Then on the left side I list the six aspects with rows 
			next to them.  
			 
			1) Respect: How much do each of them feel respected by their 
			partner? People who report low levels of respect often experience 
			criticism or judgment from the other. 
			 
			2) Feeling Heard: How much does their partner listen to them? 
			Those who don't feel heard complain of being ignored, tuned out or 
			talked over by the other. 
			 
			3) Understood: How much do each of them feel understood by 
			their partner? People with low levels of understanding from the 
			other report frustration around their partner not getting them or 
			twisting their words into an entirely different meaning. 
			 
			4) Validation: How much do they each feel validated by each 
			other? Low levels of validation are problematic to any relationship 
			in that one or both don't feel that their partner gets what they're 
			saying. Its one step beyond understanding and it doesn't require the 
			partner to necessarily agree with them. 
			 
			5) Empathy: How much do they each feel the other can be 
			empathetic with them? A low number on this is the most toxic of the 
			six aspects in that a lack of empathy in a relationship means a lack 
			of attunement to the others emotions. The partner experiencing a 
			lack of empathy can experience a great deal of sadness or anger. 
			"You don't care how I feel." 
			 
			6) Love: How much do they feel loved by each other? This 
			encapsulates and reflects the state of the previous five. Couples 
			who report low levels of feeling loved by the other typically have 
			low numbers in the other aspects.  
			 
			Doing this type of charting makes it easy to compare and contrast 
			how each person feels in the relationship. This tool is very helpful 
			to anyone wanting to assess the emotional safety in their 
			relationship. Be aware that it will likely bring up a lot for both 
			partners. If the topic proves to cause too much emotional reactivity 
			then a trained therapist can help flesh out the results and provide 
			a roadmap to make changes. In my work I find that it often involves 
			altering communication styles, behavior modification, exploration of 
			family of origin issues and identification of core beliefs. The 
			greatest evidence of change in the relationship are these numbers 
			going up - and they can!  
			 
			 
			Lisa Brookes Kift is a Marriage & 
			Family Therapist Registered Intern practicing in San Diego, 
			California. Her focus is individual, couples and premarital 
			counseling. For more information or to schedule an appointment, see 
			her website at
			
			www.lisakifttherapy.com.  
			
			 
             
			  | 
            
             
             
         
        
    
 
 
  
  
 |